Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
55,482 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 49,896 (89.9%) 
Undecided
  
 3,093 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,493 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-19 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Brunnera macrophylla (Siberian bugloss), flowers
  •  Support Useful and used --Pierre André (talk) 20:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Location information (Les Martels, Giroussens Tarn, France) is good information to be added to the image description but makes the scope too narrow. The plant is native to the Caucasus. The Les Martels floral garden happened to have an example in their collection that is being presented here. At the moment, I am thinking that the best scope for review would be "Brunnera macrophylla (Siberian bugloss), flowers" but am interested in your thoughts on the issue of native versus non-native plants. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @GRDN711: ✓ Done This is a subject that has interested me a lot in the past because I have long focused on the origin of plants. But with time, and the global diffusion, then the appearance of cultivars, the natural emergence of new subspecies, I abandoned my first convictions. The only thing that really matters is the plant. In VI geographical location is not of great interest these days. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Not my subject, but I see little value in VIs of cultivars. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The term cultivar is very well defined and is governed by strict rules of the International Code for the Nomenclature of Cultivated Plants. There will be more and more and they will be welcome in VI.

In the case of the image, this has nothing to do with it: it is the species Brunnera macrophylla.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I appreciate your comments and change of scope to exclude the plant location. While I disagree with Charles, I am still struggling with the issue cultivars.
The COM:VIS domain-specific guidelines on plants allows for scope definition down to the level of cultivar if it is visually distinct at the cultivar level. Your image is being used to illustrate the species category as well as Category:Brunnera (cultivars) and Category:Brunnera macrophylla (cultivars). If the plant known to be a cuiltivar, it would seem appropriate ath this information should be placed in the image description even if you are nominating at the species level. Can you comment further? --GRDN711 (talk) 04:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-20 04:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Highest point Petrisberg (Trier) Above Trier.
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose =>
undecided. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-20 10:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Oenanthe leucura (Black wheatear )
Thank you. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Am opposing as IMHO this one, with its tighter crop provides better focus and illustration for a species VI. I also think your image has merit. Your image has lots of resolution. Would you consider a similar tighter crop for better illustration of the species? --GRDN711 (talk) 04:32, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-21 20:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Mass grave of 664 Soviet soldiers in Balabanivka
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-22 09:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz X214 - left rear view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz Baureihe 214, en:Mercedes-Benz E-Class (W214)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-22 09:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Dacia Logan III - right front view
Used in:
de:Dacia Logan, uk:Dacia Logan
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-22 09:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-AMG GLB 35 4MATIC (X247) (2023) - left front view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz X 247
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-22 09:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Viaduc de la ligne de chemin de fer Paris-Calais (Wimereux), view from quai Alfred Hazebrouck
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Mile (talk) on 2024-06-22 10:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Sava-Danube confluence
Used in:
Sava, Сава
Reason:
good shot from drone, best view so far -- Mile (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Nikride (talk) on 2024-06-22 11:36 (UTC)
Scope:
World War II memorial in Orativ
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-22 12:05 (UTC)
Scope:
The Foucault pendulum inside the Saint Isaac's Cathedral, 1984
Used in:
en:Saint Isaac's Cathedral
Reason:
The world's heaviest Foucault pendulum was attached to the dome of Saint Isaac's Cathedral in Russia from 1931 to 1985. This is currently the only image of pendulum in Commons. There seems to be no other free images. -- Thi (talk)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-22 12:14 (UTC)
Scope:
John Locke
Used in:
en:John Locke etc.
Reason:
Cropped version of portrait of John Locke by Godfrey Kneller. Widely used in wikiprojects. -- Thi (talk)
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-22 15:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Fountain with animal sculptures. (Eagle) in Trier by an unknown artist.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-22 21:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Chroicocephalus genei (Slender-billed gull)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-23 04:42 (UTC)
Scope:
15, Via Mazzanti, Verona. Commemorative plaque at the place where began the Veronese Easters
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-23 04:44 (UTC)
Scope:
The Last Judgment - Francisco Pacheco - Goya Museum
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-23 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Athena MAN 227
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-23 08:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Renault Alaskan - left rear view
Used in:
de:Renault Alaskan
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-23 08:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-Benz X214 - left front view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-23 08:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercedes-AMG GLB 35 4MATIC (X247) (2023) - left rear view
Used in:
de:Mercedes-Benz X 247

 Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 15:49, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-23 09:28 (UTC)
Scope:
Dombunker (Wiederstandsnest Gabelweihe) de Wimereux, front-view from rue Charles Lecocq.- Pas-de-Calais
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-23 10:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Ch’ti Blockhaus d’Audresselles, view from Rue de la Mer, Pas-de-Calais
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-23 22:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Buteo rufinus cirtensis (Long-legged buzzard)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-24 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Campo San Giacometto (Venice) - Fountain - Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-24 05:16 (UTC)
Scope:
The Adoration of the Magi by Alejo Fernandez - Musée Goya - Castres France
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-24 05:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Forze d'Ercole dei Castellani - Museo Correr Venice
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-06-24 02:41 (UTC)
Scope:
View of the city of Confresa from Avenida Brasil (BR-158)
Used in:
‍d:Q1805601, en:Confresa, es:Confresa

Scope changed from Confresa to View of the city of Confresa from Avenida Brasil (BR-158) --Túllio F (talk) 16:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-06-23 22:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Igreja São Pedro Apóstolo - Vila Rica
Used in:
‍d:Q126560002
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-06-23 20:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Front view of the Palácio Araguaia (Vila Rica), Avenida Brasil
Used in:
‍d:Q126560001, en:Vila Rica (Mato Grosso), pt:Vila Rica (Mato Grosso)

 Comment The scope is too broad, many better, like this one. --Pierre André (talk) 09:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment @Pierre André Leclercq. I chose this image for a better view of the entire building. Túllio F (talk) 17:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scope changed from Palácio Araguaia (Vila Rica) to Front view of the Palácio Araguaia (Vila Rica), Avenida Brasil --Túllio F (talk) 17:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
 Support OK for me. --Pierre André (talk) 20:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC) Useful and used[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-06-23 18:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Aerial view of the city center of Cachoeira do Arari
Used in:
‍pt:Cachoeira do Arari, es:Cachoeira do Arari, en:Cachoeira do Arari, it:Cachoeira do Arari,
Thanks for the comment @Archaeodontosaurus. The scope has been corrected. Sets to an image that represents a good aerial view of the city center. Túllio F (talk) 17:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scope changed from Cachoeira do Arari to Aerial view of the city center of Cachoeira do Arari --Túllio F (talk) 16:59, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 24 June 2024
Scope:
Pantoporia sandaka davidsoni (Indian Extra Lascar) - dorsal
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-24 09:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Redunca arundinum (Southern reedbuck) female
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-24 10:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Chlorocebus pygerythrus (Vervet monkey) rear view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-24 10:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Villa Le Roulis (Wimereux), view from Rue du Capitaine Ferber (Pas-de-Calais)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-24 12:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait painting of Georg Friedrich Händel by Balthasar Denner
Used in:
en:George Frideric Handel, en:Age of Enlightenment and others
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-24 12:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Jorge Luis Borges by Grete Stern, 1951
Used in:
en:Jorge Luis Borges and others
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-24 12:38 (UTC)
Scope:
Jorge Luis Borges by Annemarie Heinrich, 1967
Used in:
fi:Jorge Luis Borges
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-24 15:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Villa Gabrielle, puis Villa Guby (Wimereux), view from Rue du Général de Gaulle, (Pas-de-Calais)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-24 15:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Villa Le Lutétia (Wimereux), view from Av. du Maréchal Foch, (Pas-de-Calais)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-24 22:16 (UTC)
Scope:
Curruca deserti (African Desert Warbler)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-24 22:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Passer simplex (Desert sparrow) male
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-06-25 01:19 (UTC)
Scope:
MT-130 State highway
Used in:
‍MT-130
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-25 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Asclepius Head (364/B)

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-25 05:16 (UTC)
Scope:
La tenda rossa (The red tent) by Giovanni Boldini.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-25 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Bust of Luigi Serena by Silio Rossetto - Museo 'Luigi Bailo' Treviso

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-25 15:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen Golf VIII R 333 Limited Edition - right rear view

 Support --Thi (talk) 17:26, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-25 15:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Oenanthe halophila (Maghreb Wheatear) male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-25 16:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Villa Ma Lolotte (Wimereux); view from Rue du Tennis
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-06-25 16:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Paróquia Nossa Senhora Aparecida - Água Boa, front view from Rua Nove (Água Boa - Mato Grosso)
Used in:
‍d:Q126900807->
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Suntooooth (talk) on 2024-06-25 19:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Hyperia (Thorpe Park)
Used in:
en:Hyperia (roller coaster)

Previous reviews

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Suntooooth (talk) on 2024-06-25 19:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Pteridium aquilinum in England
Used in:
en:Pteridium aquilinum

 Oppose The scope is not correct. Only the leaf is visible. we must reduce the scope to what is visible. The reference category isPteridium aquilinum (leaves) and there are better candidates for VI in this category. The location is not a determining factor here, it has no interest in the scope. The binomial must be in Italy and if possible followed by the non-vernacular in English.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-25 19:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Strix mauritanica (Maghreb Owl)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-25 20:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Sylvia undata (Dartford warbler) male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-26 04:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Half-opened flower bud of a Hypochaeris radicata (catsear, flatweed).
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-26 05:00 (UTC)
Scope:
Peplophoros - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-26 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Traghetto Santa Sofia (Venice) view from the grand canal
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-06-26 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Giovanni Boldini - Portrait of The Marchesa Luisa Casati - Roma, Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-26 11:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Edvard Westermarck by Magnus Enckell, 1913
Used in:
sv:Magnus Enckell
Reason:
Portrait of important sociologist Edvard Westermarck. An example of artist Magnus Enckell's use of bright colors. There is currently no higher resolution version available. -- Thi (talk)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-06-26 11:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Campicoloides bifasciatus (Buff-streaked chat) male
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-06-26 12:02 (UTC)
Scope:
North team of the British Ladies' Football Club, 1895
Used in:
en:Association football, en:Women's association football, en:British Ladies' Football Club, fr:Histoire des femmes, fr:Sport féminin, fr:Nettie Honeyball, sv:Florence Dixie
Reason:
North team of the British Ladies' Football Club, the first women's football team in England, 1895. -- Thi (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-26 15:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Volkswagen Golf VIII R 333 Limited Edition - right front view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-06-26 15:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Micro Microlino Lite - left front view
Used in:
fr:Salon international de l'automobile de Genève 2024
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-06-26 15:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Villa Martin Pêcheur (Wimereux), view from Rue des Anglais (Pas-de-Calais)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-06-26 16:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Fresco of biblical figures in the Reformierte Kirche San Bastian (Zernez) Biblical scene.
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-26 23:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Scotocerca inquieta saharae (Streaked Scrub Warbler) saharae
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-06-26 23:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Oenanthe leucopyga (White-crowned Wheatear)
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 05:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 05:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=751225986"